What is Continuous Curriculum in Math Bad H

2. Prove that $f$ is continuous at a if and only if $\lim _{h\to0} f (a + h) = f(a)$

Prove that $f$ is continuous at a if and only if $\lim _{h\to0} f (a + h) = f(a)$

Solution 1

Have you tried the obvious guess, i.e. writing $x$ as $a+(x-a) = x$, and then noticing that $x \to a$ if and only if $h = x-a \to 0$?

Solution 2

Here is my proof. Basically as others have said whenever you see "if and only if" you want to the statements imply each other.

So suppose $f$ is continuous at $a$, then $\forall \epsilon > 0$, $\exists \delta > 0$ such that $|x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon$. In particular we want to show $\displaystyle\lim_{h\to0} f(a+h ) =f(a)$, so let us consider $|h - 0| < \delta$. Then we have $|h - 0| = |h| = |h + a - a| <\delta \implies |f(h + a) - f(a)| < \epsilon$ (here we sneakily let $x = h + a$) as desired.

On the other hand, let us assume we have $\displaystyle\lim_{h\to0} f(a+h ) =f(a)$ instead. Then $\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists \delta >0$ such that $|h| < \delta \implies|f(a+h) - f(a)| < \epsilon$. Consider $|x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(a)| = |f(a + (x - a)) - f(a)| < \epsilon$. Thus we have shown that the two are indeed equivalent (again we let $h = x-a$)

Solution 3

OK. An obvious step you should take is plugging the definition into you question:

$$\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=f(a)\qquad \text{if and only if} \qquad \lim_{h\to 0}f(a+h)=f(a)$$

As Gowers recently said, I think this is a fake difficulty for you. In order to answer your question, I would like to ask you more basic questions:

Do you know what does "if and only if" mean? Do you know the definitions of these two limits?

Now you can go on by yourself.

Solution 4

Here, we have:

$$ \lim_{h \to 0} f(a+h)$$

Put $$a+h=x$$

if $$h \to 0$$

then $$x \to a$$

So, now we have

$$\lim_{x \to a} f(x)$$

Note that this limit will be $f(a)$ if there is no discontinuity of any type in the curve. So, if

$$\lim_{x \to a} f(x)= \lim_{h \to 0} f(a+h)= f(a)$$

Then the function is continuous at $a$.

Related videos on Youtube

10 : 10

3 Step Continuity Test, Discontinuity, Piecewise Functions & Limits

The Organic Chemistry Tutor

09 : 56

Proof that f(x) = 1/x is Continuous on (0, infinity) using Delta-Epsilon

19 : 54

Continuous functions in topological spaces

18 : 03

Topology of Metric Spaces | Continuous Functions | Lecture 4

08 : 00

Lecture 28 | Composition of two continuous functions is also continuous | Topology by James R Munkre

Comments

• This is a question from a calculus sample test, and I can't figure out how to prove it. Can I get some help from you guys?

  Definition of continuity that we've learned is $$\lim_{x\to a} f(x) = f(a).$$ If that holds, then $f$ is continuous at $a$.

  The definition that we learned of a limit is:

  For every $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $|x - a| < \delta$ implies $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$.

  $\epsilon$ and $\delta$, as far as I can tell, are just variables, $a$ is what $x$ is approaching, and $L$ is the limit.

  • Is your definition of continuity at $a$ that $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$? You should mention this, as well as your question and what you've tried, in the body of the post for better results. I do think you'll get some excellent answers any moment now, though.

  • Yes, this sort of theorem depends on your definitions,and usually follows straight from them. In particular, it depends on the definition of "limit" and the definition of "continuous at a.". Different books use different definitions, so it is hard to give a proof without these definitions.

  • OK. What you need to show is $\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=f(a)$ if and only if $\lim_{h\to 0}f(a+h)=f(a)$. Do you know what does "if and only if" mean? Furthermore, do you know the definitions of these two limits?

  • I know what if and only if means in English, and I think it means something very similar in math. I'm editing in the definitions we learned now.

  • @Lman: Even "if" alone means something subtly different in mathematics than it does in English. For example, "Paris is the capital of France if $x^2<0$" is close to nonsense in ordinary English, but in math it is meaningful and true.

• Okay. Thanks for this, I think I'm making progress. If and only if means that one of them can't possibly be correct without the other one being correct as well, right? And if the definition on the left is correct, you can just plug in what the limit is approaching for the variable that is is approaching. The x becomes a. So assuming that's true, you can plug 0 in for h on the left side of the if and only if, and f(a+0) = f(a)

• @Lman: While what you say is correct as far as "if and only if" goes, perhaps it is better to think of it as giving you two implications: if the left hand side is true, then the right hand side has to be true as well; and (separately), if the right hand side is true, then the left hand side must be true as well.

• @Patrick_Da_Silva is this a rigorous proof? What does it mean x->a? As x gets close to a? Do we consider x a sequence now? I am honestly confused, could you please elaborate?

• @Sorfosh what is it?

• @Patrick_Da_Silva My apologies, I have edited my comment. I am just consumed what we are doin here. Usually the notation x->a says that the limit of the sequence x is a. However it has a different meaning in the limit, or at least I think. How would you formally write up what you have done? I am just a little confused, thanks!

• @Sorfosh : You're not the OP, so I don't know what your question/confusion is about. Plus, $x$ is not a sequence ; the notation "$x\to a$" is a notation that indicates at which point we are computing the limit, no sequence involved.

• @Patrick_Da_Silva I am not the op but I am trying to understand the solution. I am confused as to what you are doing. You proof is that we want to show Lim f(x) where x->a equals f(a), if and only if lim f(x) where x-a->0 equals f(a)?

• Your question doesn't quite make sense either. I don't even see a question in the OP's post anymore, it must have been edited. Of course x -> a if and only if x-a -> 0, that doesn't need proof.

• Welcome to MSE. Your answer adds nothing new to the already existing answers.

• Everything makes sense, though $x=h+a$ is a bit confusing. We have $\forall{h}\in \mathbb{R}(0<|h+a-a|<\delta)$. We want $\forall x\in\mathbb{R}(0<|x-a|<\delta)$. But $ℎ+𝑎$ is any real number and we can name it $x$. Is it about right?

• And we can say that the domain of $f$ is $\mathbb{R}=\{x\in\mathbb{R} | x=h+a\}$ for some real number $h$ and a constant $a$.

Recents

Related

eastmanolike1957.blogspot.com

Source: https://9to5science.com/prove-that-f-is-continuous-at-a-if-and-only-if-lim-_-h-to0-f-a-h-f-a

Share this post